Eating CPU and memory

Found a serious/minor bug in PopTray? Tell me about it.

Moderators: KY Dave, jojobear99, Rdsok

Locked
User avatar
vitoco
Veteran
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Chile
Contact:

Eating CPU and memory

Post by vitoco » Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:36 pm

PopTray 3.2 beta 5 RC1 is eating all my CPU and memory when it finds the following message header while seeking for new mail:

Code: Select all

Return-Path: <daniel@sender.cl>
Received: from inti.inf.destination.cl (inti.inf.destination.cl [210.1.19.1])
        by alegre.inf.destination.cl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k6R0VkMb030151
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <vitoco@users.inf.destination.cl>; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:31:46 -0400
Received: from sersender.sender.cl (sersender.sender.cl [210.72.161.26])
        by inti.inf.destination.cl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k6R0VkT8019931
        for <vitoco@inf.destination.cl>; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:31:46 -0400
Message-ID: <49200.210.111.2.190.1153959009.squirrel@webmail.sender.cl>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:10:09 -0400 (CLT)
Subject:
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Le=EDdo:_=3D=3Fiso-8859-1=3Fb=3FSW5zY3JpcGNp824=3D=3F=3D_e?=
 l alfacrux
From: daniel@sender.cl
To: vitoco@inf.destination.cl
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report;report-type=disposition-notification;
     charset=iso-8859-1;boundary="----=_20060726201009_37166"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.3 (alegre.inf.destination.cl [210.1.19.138]); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:31:46 -0400 (CLT)
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:30:02 by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (inti.inf.destination.cl [210.1.19.1]); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:31:46 -0400 (CLT)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1621/Wed Jul 26 02:13:01 2006 on alegre.inf.destination.cl
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on inti.inf.destination.cl
X-Virus-Status: Clean
I have to kill it to free resources... :?

This header belongs to a receipt notification. I captured it using a POP3's TOP 0 command.

I'm not sure, but I think that it is related to the subject's format.

No filters are enabled, and beta 1 has the same behavior.

++Vitoco

User avatar
Renier
Site Admin
Posts: 1957
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 12:54 pm
Location: Cape Town, South-Africa
Contact:

Post by Renier » Sun Jul 30, 2006 9:17 am

Yes, it's probably the decoding of that subject line. Unfortunately that is done by the Indy components, so a little bit out of my hands.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests